|
Turn to Revelation, chapter 22, verse 18, “For I
testify to everyone who hears the Words of the prophecy of this
book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the
plagues that are written in this book; …” I’ve
heard someone argue about that and say, “Well, John’s only talking
about the Book of Revelation here. He doesn’t have in mind
here the entire Bible.” Well, I don’t believe
that! At a minimum, if he doesn’t have in mind all of the
Scripture, this at least sets up a principle, does it
not? If God’s instruction through His man, John, was “don’t
add anything to this Book—this specific revelation,” then, I submit
to you, that that principle would be applicable for all of the
books, all of God’s Word. When John finished the book of
Revelation, the Word of God was complete. The “revelation”
was complete. We pervert the Word when we add anything to
it. The revelation is complete! It is finished!
There is no continuing revelation from God. Those who claim
such—in this age or ages past—those who go about and claim that God
speaks to them and gives them a revelation, a word, or an
instruction are liars! Do you want me to say what I really
think! I think they are liars! The revelation is
complete! There is no continuing revelation; there hasn’t
been since John put the pen down after he penned the book of
Revelation; and there will not to be in the future.
Another way of perverting the Gospel is by taking away
from the body of Truth. Just as one must not add
to the Word, likewise we must not take anything away.
Revelation 22, verse 19, “and if anyone takes away from
the Words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his
part from the Book of Life, from the holy city, and from the things
which are written in this book.” We must declare
and follow the whole counsel of God, Acts 20, verse 27, the
verse that we cited a moment ago. We ought not to leave
anything out, because it’s all important. Again, thinking
about some things that the denominational world leaves out, and
there would be plenty we could cite, but for example, the necessity
of baptism, the part that baptism plays in salvation, the
forgiveness of sin, the hope of eternal life. That is left
out! Oh, it’s there in the Bibles that they use to teach
from, but it’s not taught or presented. The whole counsel of
God is not being presented. This Truth is being “taken
away.” We cannot reject parts of the Bible or omit
certain passages because they do not harmonize or agree with our
own way of thinking, or with some family tradition, or with
something that we learned a long time ago, etc. We must teach
all of the Truth.
There is another way that the Gospel can be perverted, and
that is by the failure to “rightly divide” the Truth.
Paul exhorted Timothy by saying, “Be diligent to present
yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed,
rightly dividing the Word of Truth,” 2 Timothy 2, verse
15. In the original language, that idea of “rightly
dividing” carries with it the idea of “cutting a straight line”—not
a jagged line, not zigzagging—but cutting a straight
line!
The Bible is to be understood as any other book. Now don’t
misunderstand what I’m saying here. It is to be understood as
any other book, in that the information that is contained in it is
clear, is understandable, and we don’t need to have
it interpreted for us, etc. So it is to be seen as a
historical book in one way, written over a period of 1,600
years by 40 different authors, and all inspired by the Holy
Spirit. It IS God’s body of Truth, not to be added to, or
taken away from.
Many factors are to be considered as we study the Bible.
The “rules” of Bible study should be applied. You know these
and have heard them before. You have utilized them in your
own study, but let’s go over them again:
1. When we read the Bible, it is very important that we
understand who is speaking.
2. To whom are they speaking? Who is the
audience that is present when the speaking is being done? Or
in some cases, who is this being written to?
3. What period of Bible history (dispensation) is being
considered? Is it the Patriarchal age? Is it the
Mosaical age? Or, is it the Christian age? Of course,
this is a huge mistake that is made by a lot of people. Many
people want to justify the things they do in worship or in their
lives, and they’ll reach back into the Old Testament. For
example, how many times have you heard someone, who is trying to
justify instrumental music in worship, say, “Well, David played the
harp!” Okay, so what! We can’t mix those—we must
understand where we are in the Bible.
4. What is the context of the passage? We
should never use a passage of Scripture out of context. There
is a “Baileyism” that I will remind you of. You’ve heard
George Bailey (a preacher of the Gospel) say this many times:
“A Scripture taken out of context is nothing but a
pretext.” And a pretext is a “false statement.”
5. What kind of language is being used? Is it
literal? Is it symbolic? Is it prose or
poetry?
6. Does my understanding of this Scripture harmonize
with all other Scriptures? Now there’s an important
rule! When we have an understanding and a knowledge of the
Scriptures, then we should be looking for things to fit
together and to harmonize. If we run across
something that all of a sudden is “sticking out,” that doesn’t fit
together, that, in our mind, doesn’t harmonize with other
Scriptures in the Bible, then we better go back and visit that
Scripture. We, perhaps, have a misunderstanding of the
Scripture we are reading. We better go back and study
it. It must—it will harmonize together!
God does not have a conflicting body of Truth!
| | | | |