|
The Rise of
“Creeds”
This period not only saw the assembling and the acknowledging of
the New Testament, the canon of the New Testament, but it also saw
the beginnings of what would become known as
“creeds.” As we go along in this study of the
history of the church, we’re seeing along the way how things
developed that would eventually lead to the various types of
apostasy in the church. And here is another one of those,
this idea of developing certain creeds.
It’s generally felt that, like so many of the other
things, some that we’ve already looked at and some we will
look at as we through this study, that the development of creeds
actually came from a good reason. It was believed that these
were actually simple statements of faith that grew out of early
baptismal services. Usually, these were something that were,
maybe, a paraphrase of the good confession that
Peter made there in Matthew, chapter 16 and verse
16, or perhaps, using the words of the Ethiopian eunuch
before he was baptized by Philip, Acts, chapter 8 and verse
37.
And so, these were just simple statements, something like,
“Jesus is Lord.” Well, is there anything wrong
with that? Ah, well, no, not really, but as the doctrinal
attacks and other attacks came upon the church, these creedal
statements began to become more and more elaborate, started to
become more and more involved in the content, and so on. And
eventually, there would be developed the “Apostles’
Creed.” I’m sure that you have all heard of the
Apostles’ Creed. I have a copy of it here. I
thought I would share it with you. This has been revised
many, many times over the years, but here is the Apostles’
Creed, which is generally accepted and used and recognized by a
number of denominations these days. The Apostles’ Creed
goes like this:
I believe in God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and
earth.
And in Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord; who was conceived by the
Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, dead, and buried; he descended into
hell; the third day he rose again from the dead; he ascended into
heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty;
from thence he shall come to judge the quick and the
dead.
I believe in the
Holy Ghost; the holy catholic Church; the communion of saints; the
forgiveness of sins; the resurrection of the body; and the life
everlasting. AMEN.
Well, that is the Apostle’s Creed, as I said, which is
generally accepted by the Catholic church and some other
denominations. Episcopalians and some others use a varied
form of this, as well.
Well, as a result of the doctrinal controversies from the
4th Century on, these creeds became more and more
involved and more and more elaborate. They also came to
embody very involved theological and philosophical statements, and
even speculation. They also became divisive, and various and
serious schisms in the church came about over these creeds.
Just a turn of a phrase or two became controversial to the point
where churches were separated. The first steps toward
creed-making seemed like a good idea at the time, but would develop
into controversy later, as was the rise of the strong
“Bishop” that we talked about earlier, the development
of ecclesiastical organizations. These seemingly
inconsequential departures from the simplicity of the New Testament
indeed had repercussions which continue to this day.
We’re reminded of a phrase, which is used and is actually a
secular phrase, but it’s appropriate to use oftentimes.
I hear it in the Lord’s church, talking about “a
slippery slope.” “Stay away from the slippery
slopes,” some would say. There are some who would say,
“Well, you know, we don’t need to be concerned about
that. There’s nothing to be worried about in that
regard.” But, I believe that these are worthy examples
of the “slippery slope,” beginning something that seems
to be right, that seems to be proper, that seems to, well, not
really have any problems associated with it, but we can see that
that’s not so.
The Rise of “Baptism” by Pouring and
Sprinkling – Also Infant
“Baptism.”
But here is another departure of the simplicity of the New
Testament. This has to do with baptism and the rites
associated with it. We know that, of course, baptism in the
New Testament is very straightforward, very easily
understood. In Romans 6, Paul characterizes
what baptism is—the death, the burial and the
resurrection. We can see that; it’s very simple;
it’s very plain. We also understand who candidates for
baptism are. We understand what a person must do. These
things are very plain.
However, evidences begin to appear as early as the
2nd Century that a departure can be seen from this
simple, straightforward New Testament pattern for what one must do
to be saved, and specifically, baptism. There was an early
Christian writing, dated about AD 120 called
theDidache, and it indicates that baptism
by pouring water over the head of the candidate was acceptable in
some cases of illness, although, if the person returned to health,
they were expected to be immersed.
We also see, beginning about this same period of time,
sprinkling began to be practiced, and by the end of this period, in
the early 300’s, the early part of the 4th
Century, even the baptism of infants had its beginning, although
many, many in the early days of this practice opposed it very
strongly.
| | | | |