|
Well, that
brings us, then, to the 1906 Census. The U. S. Census Bureau
gave official recognition to this reality, to the reality of what
was going on. You know, when we talk about the Census Bureau
giving “official recognition,” it’s not that they
did anything except to acknowledge, to document what was going
on. The 1906 Census was actually not published until
1910.
Well, a little
bit of history about this. June 17, 1901, the Director of the
Census—his name was S. N. D. North; I don’t know what
the three initials stood for—would write to David Lipscomb,
and he asked whether there a religious body called “Church of
Christ” not identified with the Disciples of
Christ or any Baptist body. And if there is such a church, he
went on in his letter, he wanted information about its
organization, about its principles and how the Census Bureau could,
then, document and list numerical data about this group, these
churches.
Well, David
Lipscomb would reply to Mr. North’s letter, and in the letter
he would outline the basic principles of the Restoration Movement
as were formulated in Thomas Campbell’s “Declaration
and Address.” And then next, Lipscomb charged that
these principles—these principles that he had laid
out—had been betrayed, had been violated, when the Society
and instrumental music were introduced; and than he stated that
division had come about as a result of those things. Lipscomb
would go on in his letter to Mr. North—and this is actually a
quote from his letter—he said that “the polity of
churches being purely congregational, the influences work slowly
and the division comes gradually. The parties are
distinguished as they call themselves conservatives and
progressives, as they call each other antis and digressers.
In many places, the differences have not as yet resulted in
separation. There are some in the conservative churches in
sympathy with the progressives, who worship and work with the
conservatives because they have no other church facilities.
The reverse of this is also true. Many of the conservatives
are trying to appropriate the name “churches of Christ”
to distinguish themselves from the Christian or Disciples
churches.”
A few months
later, after this exchange of letters between David Lipscomb and
Mr. North, Mr. North would visit the Gospel Advocate
offices in Nashville, Tennessee, and arrangements would be made for
Brother J. W. Shepherd, who was one of the co-editors of The
Gospel Advocate, to compile a list of churches of Christ for
the census report. Now in retrospect, many don’t
believe that Brother Shepherd’s numbers—this accounting
of churches of Christ—were exactly accurate. Remember
the times; remember the difficulties in communication, in travel;
and then remember the difficulty in knowing exactly where one
congregation might stand at that particular moment in
time.
Nevertheless,
the 1906 Census reveals two significant facts about the Restoration
Movement. [Below is the information provided by John Phillis
on a handout:]
The United States Census Bureau gave
official recognition to the reality of a division between the
Christian Churches [also called the Disciples] and churches of
Christ in its 1906 religious census, which was published in
1910. While the count was considered inexact, it did reveal
two significant facts about what had occurred.
First, the Christian Churches were
the larger body. The census report listed 8,293 churches and
982,701 members for the Christian Churches, while the churches of
Christ had only 2,649 churches and 159,658 members. Second,
it was clear that the Christian Churches had won the North, while
the churches of Christ found their numbers concentrated in the
South. In the band of states stretching from Ohio to Kansas
and Nebraska (the heartland of the Restoration Movement), the
Disciples outnumbered the churches of Christ by 534,695 to 31,883,
a ratio of 19 to 1. The same 19-to-1 ratio prevailed in the
Atlantic seaboard states from Maine to Florida.
The ten states in which the churches
of Christ had their largest membership are listed below (with the
membership of the Christian Churches in the same states for
comparative
purposes):
|
State |
church of Christ Membership |
Christian Church Membership |
| 1 |
Tennessee |
41,411 |
14,904 |
| 2 |
Texas |
34,006 |
39,550 |
| 3 |
Kentucky |
12,451 |
123,659 |
| 4 |
Arkansas |
11,006 |
10,269 |
| 5 |
Indiana |
10,259 |
108,188 |
| 6 |
Alabama |
9,214 |
8,756 |
| 7 |
Oklahoma |
8,074 |
24,232 |
| 8 |
Missouri |
7,087 |
159,050 |
| 9 |
Ohio |
4,954 |
83,833 |
| 10 |
Illinois |
3,552 |
101,516 |
|
|
|
|
Ten years later in 1916, the
churches of Christ were stronger than the Christian Churches in
Texas, with 71,542 members compared with 54,836 for the
Disciples. Also, Texas had surpassed Tennessee as the state
where the churches of Christ had their largest
membership.
| | | | |